Profane and Vain Babblings
A. W. Tozer
Many of our best-known preachers and teachers have developed ventriloquial tongues and can not make their voices come from any direction. They have surrendered the traditional categories of religious thought. For them there is no black or white, there is only gray. Anyone who makes a claim to having "accepted Christ" is admitted at once into the goodly fellowship of the prophets and the glorious company of the apostles regardless of the worldliness of his life or vagueness of his doctrinal beliefs.
I have listened to certain speakers and have recognized the ingredients that went to make up their teachings. A bit of Freud, a dash of Émile Coué, a lot of watered-down humanism, tender chucks of Emersonian transcendentalism, auto-suggestion á la Dale Carnegie, plenty of hopefulness and religious sentimentality, but nothing hard and sharp and specific. Nothing of the either/or of Christ and Peter and Paul. None of the "Who is on the LORD'S side" (Exodus 32:26) of Moses, or the "Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve" (Joshua 24:15) of Joshua: just tender pleading to "take Jesus and let Him solve your problems."
If such as I here describe were cultists or liberals of one stripe or another I would say nothing more about it, but many of them are professed evangelicals. Press them and they will insist that the believe the Scriptures and accept every tenet of the historic Christian faith, but listen to them teach and you are left wondering. They are building upon sand; the rock of sound theology is not under them.
The notion is now pretty well disseminated throughout the ranks of current evangelicalism that love is really all that matters and for that reason we ought to receive everyone whose intention is right, regardless of his doctrinal position, granted of course that he is ready to read the Scriptures, trust Jesus and pray. The unregenerate sympathies of the fallen human heart adopt this foggy creed eagerly. The trouble is that the holy Scriptures teach nothing of the kind.
The Apostle Paul warned against what he called "profane and vain babblings" (1 Timothy 6:20), as for instance that of Hymaneaeus and Philetus, stating that their words would eat as does a canker and overthrow the faith of some. And what was their error? They merely taught a spiritual resurrection instead of a physical one.
"If a man hath the mind to get the start of other sinners and be in hell before them," said an old divine, "he need do no more than open his sails to the winds of heretical doctrine, and he is like to make a short voyage to hell; for these bring upon their maintainers a swift destruction." This is nearer to Paul's view than is that of the new evangelical latitudinarians. The way of the cross is still narrow.
from the book GOD TELLS THE MAN WHO CARES, Christian Publications, pp. 66-67
